Head to head · SEC data as of July 10, 2026

Monster vs Celsius: which has the stronger fundamentals?

Monster

82

Quality score · out of 100

Celsius

82

Quality score · out of 100

On paper this one is nearly a draw: Monster scores 82 and Celsius scores 82 out of 100 in our fundamental quality model. Monster wins on net margin (23.1% vs 5.9%), gross margin (55.5% vs 49.6%) and ROE (23.3% vs 13.9%). Celsius answers with revenue growth (81.4% vs 13.2%) and earnings growth (77.6% vs 7.2%).

The metrics, head to head

MetricMonsterCelsius
Quality score (0-100)8282
Net margin23.1%5.9%
Gross margin55.5%49.6%
ROE23.3%13.9%
Net debt/EBITDA-0.68×0.48×
FCF margin23.6%9.9%
Revenue growth (annualized)13.2%81.4%
Earnings growth (annualized)7.2%77.6%

TTM metrics with official SEC data, refreshed daily. Bold green marks the winner of each metric. A dash means the metric doesn't apply or isn't reliable.

What each one does

Monster. Monster Beverage is the world's number two in energy drinks, distributed globally by Coca-Cola (also a shareholder). One of American consumer's great value-creation stories: a cheap-to-make can sold with a powerful brand.

Celsius. Celsius sells 'healthier' energy drinks and delivered one of the most explosive growth stories in U.S. consumer goods. Its distribution leans on a deal with PepsiCo, which is also a shareholder.

Advertising

Want to invest in Monster?

Open your account in minutes with regulated brokers and buy U.S. and European stocks from small amounts. No paperwork.

Interactive BrokersGlobal markets

The serious investor's standard

Open free account →
WebullCommission-free

Popular in the U.S.

Open free account →

What this comparison doesn't tell you

The score measures business quality, not whether the stock is cheap or expensive: the better company can be the worse investment if you overpay. For the valuation verdict, enter each one's current price in the analyzer:

Analyze Monster →Analyze Celsius →

Frequently asked questions

Who has the stronger fundamentals today, Monster or Celsius?

They're practically tied: Monster and Celsius score 82 and 82 out of 100 in the StockSemáforo model (profitability, growth and financial strength, built on official SEC data). The score is recomputed nightly with the latest filings.

Does that make Monster the better investment?

No. The score measures business quality, not valuation: an excellent company can trade at an excessive price and be a poor investment at that price. To find out whether it's cheap or expensive, enter its current quote in the StockSemáforo analyzer.

Was this page helpful?