Fundamental analysis · SEC EDGAR · TTM through 31/03/2026
DOW · NYSE · Materials
Fundamental quality
23
out of 100
Dow Inc. is going through a tough financial stretch: it hasn't been profitable over the last twelve months. On fundamental quality it scores 23 out of 100, profiling it as a company with demanding fundamentals. Its weakest area is its profitability (net margin -6.8%). Whether it's cheap or expensive depends on the current price, which you can compute in the tool.
Dow is one of the world's largest basic-chemicals makers: plastics, silicones and intermediates ending up in packaging, construction, cars and mattresses. A pure commodity business: when the world economy sneezes, its margins catch the flu.
Revenue growth: 0.4%
Net margin: -6.8% · ROE: -17.5%
Net debt/EBITDA: 11.14x · FCF: -0.6%
Source: SEC EDGAR · TTM through 31/03/2026
The score combines growth, profitability and financial strength. Here its growth weighs in its favor, while its profitability drags it down the most.
Percentile against the other 27 Materials companies in our coverage: how far it beats them on each metric (100 = best in sector).
Computed from the daily dataset scores. A high percentile places the company among the best in its sector on that metric; it is not a buy recommendation.
Key concepts
What do these metrics mean? Fundamental analysis · What is the P/E · What is EPS · What is ROE · Net & gross margin · Free cash flow
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Free cash flow | Net debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 38,542 | 1,294 | 4,974 | 12,003 |
| 2021 | 54,968 | 6,405 | 5,508 | 11,684 |
| 2022 | 56,902 | 4,640 | 5,652 | 11,536 |
| 2023 | 44,622 | 660 | 2,840 | 11,982 |
| 2024 | 42,964 | 1,201 | -26 | 14,019 |
| 2025 | 39,968 | -2,444 | -1,447 | 14,033 |
Between 2020 and 2025, revenue went from $38,542M to $39,968M (+4%) and net income went from $1,294M to -$2,444M (-289%).
Annual figures in millions of U.S. dollars ($M) per SEC filings. Net debt is total debt minus cash.
Latest results
Figures for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, versus the quarter ended March 31, 2025 (SEC filings):
Automatic comparison between the two most recent periods filed with the SEC. One quarter doesn't make a trend: read it alongside the historical evolution above.
$2.1
per share, yearly
The dividend yield depends on today's price. Compute it in the analyzer → · See all dividend-paying stocks →
Open your account in minutes with regulated brokers and buy U.S. and European stocks from small amounts. No paperwork.
The serious investor's standard
Open free account →Anyone who wants low commissions and access to almost any market in the world.
Popular in the U.S.
Open free account →Anyone investing in the U.S. who wants a powerful, commission-free stock app.
Investing carries risk of loss.
Is Dow Inc. cheap or expensive?
That depends on the current price. Look it up, enter it in the tool and get the full valuation verdict (P/E against its sector).
Compute the valuation →Is Dow Inc. a good company to invest in?
In terms of business quality, Dow Inc. scores 23 out of 100 in our analysis, placing it as a company with demanding fundamentals. That said, this isn't a recommendation: whether it's a good investment also depends on its current price and your goals.
Is Dow Inc. a profitable company?
Over the last twelve months, no: Dow Inc. posts a negative net margin (-6.8%).
Does Dow Inc. have a lot of debt?
Yes, its leverage is high: net debt is 11.14 times its EBITDA.
Is Dow Inc. growing?
Its revenue has grown 0.4% annualized in recent years.
Does Dow Inc. generate cash?
Over the last twelve months its free cash flow was negative.
The thresholds are general and the system doesn't judge qualitative factors. See the full methodology and use this analysis as a first filter, never as a final decision.
More Materials companies
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) · DuPont (DD) · Ecolab (ECL) · Nucor (NUE) · Steel Dynamics (STLD) · Vulcan Materials (VMC) · see more →
Who's behind the methodology and model · how the score is computed
Data: see Dow Inc.'s filings on EDGAR
Spotted a figure that looks wrong? Report it and we'll review it.