Fundamental analysis · SEC EDGAR · TTM through 31/03/2026
PSX · NYSE · Energy
Fundamental quality
75
out of 100
Phillips 66 earns a fundamental-quality score of 75 out of 100, profiling it as a company with solid fundamentals. Its score rests mainly on its growth (revenue +15.2%/yr). Its weakest area is its profitability (net margin 3.1%). Whether it's cheap or expensive depends on the current price, which you can compute in the tool.
Phillips 66 is one of the big U.S. refiners, with additional legs in pipelines (midstream), chemicals and gas stations. More diversified than a pure refiner, but refining margins remain the heart of its results.
EPS growth: 33.5% · Revenue growth: 15.2%
Net margin: 3.1% · ROE: 14.5%
Source: SEC EDGAR · TTM through 31/03/2026
The score includes +3 for dividend strength: 14 consecutive years of increases. Keeping that streak demands growing cash generation and balance-sheet discipline.
The score combines growth, profitability and financial strength. Here its growth weighs in its favor, while its profitability drags it down the most.
Percentile against the other 30 Energy companies in our coverage: how far it beats them on each metric (100 = best in sector).
Computed from the daily dataset scores. A high percentile places the company among the best in its sector on that metric; it is not a buy recommendation.
Key concepts
What do these metrics mean? Fundamental analysis · What is the P/E · What is EPS · What is ROE · Net & gross margin · Free cash flow
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Free cash flow | Net debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 64,129 | -3,975 | — | 13,379 |
| 2021 | 111,476 | 1,317 | — | 11,301 |
| 2022 | 169,990 | 11,024 | — | 11,057 |
| 2023 | 147,399 | 7,015 | — | 16,036 |
| 2024 | 143,153 | 2,117 | — | 18,324 |
| 2025 | 132,376 | 4,403 | — | 18,600 |
Between 2020 and 2025, revenue went from $64,129M to $132,376M (+106%) and net income went from -$3,975M to $4,403M (+211%).
Annual figures in millions of U.S. dollars ($M) per SEC filings. Net debt is total debt minus cash.
Latest results
Figures for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, versus the quarter ended March 31, 2025 (SEC filings):
Automatic comparison between the two most recent periods filed with the SEC. One quarter doesn't make a trend: read it alongside the historical evolution above.
$4.75
per share, yearly
43.7% of earnings
Payout
14 straight years raising it
Growth
The dividend yield depends on today's price. Compute it in the analyzer → · See all dividend-paying stocks →
Open your account in minutes with regulated brokers and buy U.S. and European stocks from small amounts. No paperwork.
The serious investor's standard
Open free account →Anyone who wants low commissions and access to almost any market in the world.
Popular in the U.S.
Open free account →Anyone investing in the U.S. who wants a powerful, commission-free stock app.
Investing carries risk of loss.
Is Phillips 66 cheap or expensive?
That depends on the current price. Look it up, enter it in the tool and get the full valuation verdict (P/E against its sector).
Compute the valuation →Is Phillips 66 a good company to invest in?
In terms of business quality, Phillips 66 scores 75 out of 100 in our analysis, placing it as a company of high fundamental quality. That said, this isn't a recommendation: whether it's a good investment also depends on its current price and your goals.
Is Phillips 66 a profitable company?
Phillips 66 is profitable, with a net margin of 3.1%, though a thin one.
Is Phillips 66 growing?
Its revenue has grown 15.2% annualized in recent years and its earnings per share 33.5%.
The thresholds are general and the system doesn't judge qualitative factors. See the full methodology and use this analysis as a first filter, never as a final decision.
More Energy companies
Oneok (OKE) · Cheniere Energy (LNG) · Diamondback Energy (FANG) · Halliburton (HAL) · Baker Hughes (BKR) · Devon Energy (DVN) · see more →
Who's behind the methodology and model · how the score is computed
Data: see Phillips 66's filings on EDGAR
Spotted a figure that looks wrong? Report it and we'll review it.